Personally, I find first person stories a hard sell with me, and that’s because like the nursery rhyme said about the little girl with a curl, “when she is bad, she’s really really horrid.” So, too, with the first person point of view.
I find the best first person stories (see Cheryl Dragon’s, Best in Bed) have a first person point of view that is a character’s unique voice. Whether it’s Harry Dresden or Carrie Bradshaw, I feel an instant connection with the character. With Cheryl’s book, it was a triple home run, because each of the female leads has her own voice and they’re all unique. The voice makes the book more intimate, makes the setting all the more familiar. We walk the streets of New York City with Carrie Bradshaw, meeting Mr. Big at all the best clubs. Cheryl takes us into Chicago and makes the city a character with her use of the first person voice.
First person lends an immediacy to the story. In a historical tale, the first person narrator can bring us closer to the action and make us think that we are in Regency England or the American Frontier.
So what do you need to watch out for in first person?
It is easy for an author who hasn’t honed her craft to falter with first person. It lends itself to lazy writing, telling rather than showing. Watch out for lots of I did this and I did that paragraphs. The emotion fades away, which is a hallmark of a first person narrator telling the story, rather than showing it through their eyes.
It also can create infodumps. The narrator stops the action to relate a long string of events, some of which may not even be germane to the story. A lot of times these are side, or parenthetical remarks, that are supposed to add character, but really add boredom.
First person tales can also be skimmable tales. You know the ones where you scroll the mouse or the page (or turn them rather quickly), hitting the high points of the story because you don’t get any meat to the tale. If the reader finds herself going “yeah, yeah yeah” when reading the story, then it’s skimmable, and not at all engaging.
The truth is, the pitfalls with first person also occur in third; they just stand out more in first person. It can, however, create quite the engaging story, and when used effectively, can be a point of view that offers the reader the best view into the action. I encourage authors who wish to use first person to do so sparingly, and make sure they have plenty of beta readers familiar enough with first person pitfalls to really mark up the manuscript. That way, when it’s finished, it will shine.